Skip to content
AsteriaStar
Standards

Guidelines

What makes a good, sourced, reviewable contribution — and what the review looks for.

A good contribution is small, sourced, attached to a real object, and honest about its domain and evidence. Reviewers check exactly these things. Start from a template.

  • Attach to a real object. Every contribution references an existing entity, relationship, dataset, source, image, or timeline — no orphans.
  • Bring a source. Scientific and factual claims must reference at least one authoritative source (existing or proposed).
  • Keep domains honest. An interpretive (cultural/astrological) claim can never be marked scientific.
  • Declare evidence. Where you assert a fact, state its evidence level; it is validated against the domain.
  • Provenance for images. Image contributions must carry a license, a credit, and a source.
  • One change, one proposal. Don't bundle unrelated edits; duplicates targeting the same object are merged, not double-applied.
  • Explain why. Every proposal and changeset records a rationale and, for changes, rollback notes.

Contribution types (15)

Entity correctionscientific

Correct a field on an existing entity (e.g. a planet's radius), backed by a source.

targets: entity, source

Relationship correctionscientific

Correct the type, confidence, domain, or note of an existing relationship.

targets: relationship, source

New relationship suggestionscientific

Propose a new typed relationship between two existing entities.

targets: entity, source

New entity suggestionscientific

Propose a new entity (with a stable id) and its initial sourced metadata.

targets: entity, source

Source additionsource

Add an authoritative source that supports an existing entity or relationship.

targets: entity, relationship, source

Citation additionsource

Attach a formal citation (paper, dataset, catalogue) to an entity or relationship.

targets: entity, relationship, source, citation

Provenance improvementeditorial

Improve the provenance record of an entity, relationship, or image.

targets: entity, relationship, image, source

Image submissionimage

Submit a verified scientific image of an entity, with license, credit, and source.

targets: entity, source

Image metadata correctionimage

Correct the metadata (credit, source, instrument, provenance) of an existing image.

targets: image, source

Translation suggestiontranslation

Suggest a localized title/description for an entity in another language.

targets: entity

Timeline correctioneditorial

Correct or add an event on a sourced timeline.

targets: timeline, entity, source

Dataset issue reporteditorial

Report a completeness or correctness issue with a published dataset.

targets: dataset, entity

API issue reporteditorial

Report an issue with an Open Data API endpoint or its documentation.

targets: api

Scientific review notescientific

A scientific reviewer's note on an entity, relationship, image, or dataset.

targets: entity, relationship, image, dataset, source

Editorial review noteeditorial

An editor's note on an entity, relationship, image, dataset, or timeline.

targets: entity, relationship, image, dataset, timeline