Scientific review
How domain experts verify accuracy and evidence before a factual change is accepted.
Sourced factual claims in the science domain must pass scientific review by a domain expert, who verifies accuracy and evidence. Interpretive claims never enter this track. Evidence levels follow the platform's Scientific Authority model.
Contribution types on this track
Correct a field on an existing entity (e.g. a planet's radius), backed by a source.
Improves: Scientific accuracy, Source coverage
Correct the type, confidence, domain, or note of an existing relationship.
Improves: Relationship coverage, Scientific accuracy
Propose a new typed relationship between two existing entities.
Improves: Relationship coverage
Propose a new entity (with a stable id) and its initial sourced metadata.
Improves: Dataset completeness, Scientific accuracy
A scientific reviewer's note on an entity, relationship, image, or dataset.
Improves: Review coverage, Scientific accuracy
Evidence levels are defined on Standards.
Ready to draft one? Copy a proposal template.